4.6 Article

An assessment of selected heavy metal contamination in the surface sediments from the South China Sea before 1998

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOCHEMICAL EXPLORATION
卷 108, 期 1, 页码 1-14

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2010.08.002

关键词

Metal contamination; Surface sediments; South China Sea (SCS)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40872071, 41072068, 41030423]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2006CB403502]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Continental Dynamics, Northwest University [BJ091349]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry [SKLEG5001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rapid economic development in East Asian countries has inevitably resulted in environmental degradation in the surrounding seas, and concern for both the environment and protection against pollutants is increasing. Identification of sources of contaminants and evaluation of current environmental status are essential to environmental pollution management, but relatively little has been done in the South China Sea (SCS). In order to investigate the metal pollution status and source within the SCS, a total of 52 surface sediment samples were collected in 1998 from the SCS for the selected heavy metal measurements such as Pb, Zn, Cu, V. Cr, Cd and Sc. The total concentrations (in mg kg(-1) dry weight) in sediments ranged and averaged (mean +/- S.D.): Pb, 4.18 to 58.7 (23.6 +/- 8.93): Zn, 10.7 to 346 (87.4 +/- 47.7); Cu, 5.29 to 122 (38.1 +/- 24.6); V.0.03 to 148 (78.0 +/- 37.0): Cr, 4.48 to 589 (105 86); Cd, 0.08 to 2.14 (0.40 +/- 0.40) and Sc, 0.33 to 20.6 (10.6 +/- 4.4), respectively. Enrichment factor (EF) values and geoaccumulation indexes (I-geo) suggest that Cu, Pb, Zn and V contamination exists only in few localized areas, but Cr and Cd contamination can be found in large-scale area of the SCS before 1998. Further studies are needed to reconstruct deposition history and for trend analysis. (C) 2010 Elsevier By. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据