4.7 Article

Genome-Wide Analysis and Molecular Characterization of Heat Shock Transcription Factor Family in Glycine max

期刊

JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND GENOMICS
卷 40, 期 3, 页码 127-135

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgg.2012.12.002

关键词

Abiotic stress; Arabidopsis thaliana; Expression patterns; Glycine max; Heat shock transcription factor; Phylogenetic analysis

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (KRF)
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [KRF-2012-001205, KRF-2012-001273]
  3. Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program
  4. Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea [PJ007970]
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2012R1A1A3001205, 2012R1A1A4A01001273] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  6. Rural Development Administration (RDA), Republic of Korea [PJ007970012013] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heat shock transcription factors (Hsfs) play an essential role on the increased tolerance against heat stress by regulating the expression of heat-responsive genes. In this study, a genome-wide analysis was performed to identify all of the soybean (Glycine max) GmHsf genes based on the latest soybean genome sequence. Chromosomal location, protein domain, motif organization, and phylogenetic relationships of 26 non-redundant GmHsf genes were analyzed compared with AtHsfs (Arabidopsis thaliana Hsfs). According to their structural features, the predicted members were divided into the previously defined classes A-C, as described for AtHsfs. Transcript levels and subcellular localization of five GmHsfs responsive to abiotic stresses were analyzed by real-time RT-PCR. These results provide a fundamental clue for understanding the complexity of the soybean GmHsf gene family and cloning the functional genes in future studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据