4.7 Article

Efficient and Specific Modifications of the Drosophila Genome by Means of an Easy TALEN Strategy

期刊

JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND GENOMICS
卷 39, 期 5, 页码 209-215

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgg.2012.04.003

关键词

TALEN; Drosophila; Genomic modification; Unit assembly; Reverse genetics

资金

  1. 973 Program [2009CB918702, 2012CB945101]
  2. NSFC [31071087, 31100889]
  3. NIH [R01GM072562]
  4. National Science Foundation of USA [1052333]
  5. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences [1052333] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Technology development has always been one of the forces driving breakthroughs in biomedical research. Since the time of Thomas Morgan, Drosophilists have, step by step, developed powerful genetic tools for manipulating and functionally dissecting the Drosophila genome, but room for improving these technologies and developing new techniques is still large, especially today as biologists start to study systematically the functional genomics of different model organisms, including humans, in a high-throughput manner. Here, we report, for the first time in Drosophila, a rapid, easy, and highly specific method for modifying the Drosophila genome at a very high efficiency by means of an improved transcription activator-like effector nuclease (TALEN) strategy. We took advantage of the very recently developed unit assembly strategy to assemble two pairs of specific TALENs designed to modify the yellow gene (on the sex chromosome) and a novel autosomal gene. The mRNAs of TALENs were subsequently injected into Drosophila embryos. From 31.2% of the injected F-0 fertile flies, we detected inheritable modification involving the yellow gene. The entire process from construction of specific TALENs to detection of inheritable modifications can be accomplished within one month. The potential applications of this TALEN-mediated genome modification method in Drosophila are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据