4.5 Article

High performance optical encryption based on computational ghost imaging with QR code and compressive sensing technique

期刊

OPTICS COMMUNICATIONS
卷 353, 期 -, 页码 90-95

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.optcom.2015.04.063

关键词

Optical encryption; Computational ghost imaging; Compressive sensing; QR code

类别

资金

  1. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61271238, 61475075]
  3. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20123223110003]
  4. University Natural Science Research Foundation of Jiangsu Province [11KJA510002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, we propose a high performance optical encryption (OE) scheme based on computational ghost imaging (GI) with QR code and compressive sensing (CS) technique, named QR-CGI-OE scheme. N random phase screens, generated by Alice, is a secret key and be shared with its authorized user, Bob. The information is first encoded by Alice with QR code, and the QR-coded image is then encrypted with the aid of computational ghost imaging optical system. Here, measurement results from the GI optical system's bucket detector are the encrypted information and be transmitted to Bob. With the key, Bob decrypts the encrypted information to obtain the QR-coded image with GI and CS techniques, and further recovers the information by QR decoding. The experimental and numerical simulated results show that the authorized users can recover completely the original image, whereas the eavesdroppers can not acquire any information about the image even the eavesdropping ratio (ER) is up to 60% at the given measurement times. For the proposed scheme, the number of bits sent from Alice to Bob are reduced considerably and the robustness is enhanced significantly. Meantime, the measurement times in GI system is reduced and the quality of the reconstructed QR-coded image is improved. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据