4.4 Article

Coronaviruses in bats from Mexico

期刊

JOURNAL OF GENERAL VIROLOGY
卷 94, 期 -, 页码 1028-1038

出版社

MICROBIOLOGY SOC
DOI: 10.1099/vir.0.049759-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Emerging Pandemic Threats PREDICT
  2. NIH NIAID [R01 A1079231]
  3. DTRA
  4. CONACYT [290674]
  5. [NIH-AI57158]
  6. Division Of Environmental Biology
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences [0955897] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bats are reservoirs for a wide range of human pathogens including Nipah, Hendra, rabies, Ebola, Marburg and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (CoV). The recent implication of a novel beta (beta)-CoV as the cause of fatal respiratory disease in the Middle East emphasizes the importance of surveillance for CoVs that have potential to move from bats into the human population. In a screen of 606 bats from 42 different species in Campeche, Chiapas and Mexico City we identified 13 distinct CoVs. Nine were alpha (alpha)-CoVs; four were beta-CoVs. Twelve were novel. Analyses of these viruses in the context of their hosts and ecological habitat indicated that host species is a strong selective driver in CoV evolution, even in allopatric populations separated by significant geographical distance; and that a single species/genus of bat can contain multiple CoVs. A beta-CoV with 96.5 To amino acid identity to the beta-CoV associated with human disease in the Middle East was found in a Nyctinomops laticaudatus bat, suggesting that efforts to identify the viral reservoir should include surveillance of the bat families Molossidae/Vespertilionidae, or the closely related Nycteridae/Emballonuridae. While it is important to investigate unknown viral diversity in bats, it is also important to remember that the majority of viruses they carry will not pose any clinical risk, and bats should not be stigmatized ubiquitously as significant threats to public health.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据