4.8 Article

The prevalence of surface oxygen vacancies over the mobility of bulk oxygen in nanostructured ceria for the total toluene oxidation

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 174, 期 -, 页码 403-412

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.03.017

关键词

Ceria; Nanotubes; Nanoparticles; Nanorods; Nanocubes; Nanostructures; Crystal size; Morphology; Toluene; Surface oxygen vacancies

资金

  1. UK Engineering and Physical Science Research Council [EP/K01 6334/1, EP/L020432/1]
  2. University of Bath for ALG's studentship
  3. DGICYT in Spain [CTQ2012-37925-C03-2]
  4. Spanish MICINN
  5. CSIC [RYC-2009-04483]
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/L020432/2, EP/L020432/1, EP/K016334/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. EPSRC [EP/K016334/1, EP/L020432/2, EP/L020432/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reveals the key importance of surface oxygen defects in the oxidation catalytic activity of nanostructured ceria. A series of nanostructured rods and cubes with different physico-chemical properties have been synthesized, characterized and tested in the total toluene oxidation. The variation of the temperature and base concentration during the hydrothermal syntheses of nanostructured ceria leads not only to different ceria morphologies with high shape purity, but also to structures with tuneable surface areas and defect concentrations. Ceria nanorods present a higher surface area and a higher concentration of bulk and surface defects than nanocubes associated with their exposed crystal planes, leading to high oxidation activities. However, for a given morphology, the catalytic activity for toluene oxidation is directly related to the concentration of surface oxygen defects and not the overall concentration of oxygen vacancies as previously believed. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据