4.3 Article

P2X4 receptors in activated C8-B4 cells of cerebellar microglial origin

期刊

JOURNAL OF GENERAL PHYSIOLOGY
卷 135, 期 4, 页码 333-353

出版社

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1085/jgp.200910336

关键词

-

资金

  1. Dana Foundation
  2. UCR PIC Program
  3. NIGMS of the NIH
  4. David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA
  5. Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development
  6. NINDS of the NIH
  7. SR Foundation
  8. Stein-Oppenheimer Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated the properties and regulation of P2X receptors in immortalized C8-B4 cells of cerebellar microglial origin. Resting C8-B4 cells expressed virtually no functional P2X receptors, but largely increased functional expression of P2X4 receptors within 2-6 h of entering the activated state. Using real-time polymerase chain reaction, we found that P2X4 transcripts were increased during the activated state by 2.4-fold, but this increase was not reflected by a parallel increase in total P2X4 proteins. In resting C8-B4 cells, P2X4 subunits were mainly localized within intracellular compartments, including lysosomes. We found that cell surface P2X4 receptor levels increased by similar to 3.5-fold during the activated state. This change was accompanied by a decrease in the lysosomal pool of P2X4 proteins. We next exploited our findings with C8-B4 cells to investigate the mechanism by which antidepressants reduce P2X4 responses. We found little evidence to suggest that several antidepressants were antagonists of P2X4 receptors in C8-B4 cells. However, we found that moderate concentrations of the same antidepressants reduced P2X4 responses in activated microglia by affecting lysosomal function, which indirectly reduced cell surface P2X4 levels. In summary, our data suggest that activated C8-B4 cells express P2X4 receptors when the membrane insertion of these proteins by lysosomal secretion exceeds their removal, and that antidepressants indirectly reduce P2X4 responses by interfering with lysosomal trafficking.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据