4.0 Article

Effects of feeding Mediterranean buffalo sorghum silage versus maize silage on the rumen microbiota and milk fatty acid content

期刊

JOURNAL OF GENERAL AND APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
卷 58, 期 2, 页码 107-112

出版社

MICROBIOL RES FOUNDATION
DOI: 10.2323/jgam.58.107

关键词

bacteria; DGGE; fatty acids; Mediterranean buffalo; rumen; T-RFLP

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of Agriculture
  2. Consiglio per la Ricerca e la sperimentazione in Agricoltura (CRA, Italy)
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC, UK)
  4. DEFRA Probeef
  5. EBLEX
  6. Hybu Cig Cymru
  7. QMS
  8. European Union [FOOD-CT-2006-36241]
  9. BBSRC [BBS/E/W/10964A01B, BBS/E/W/10964A01A, BBS/E/W/10964A01C] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/W/10964A01B, BBS/E/W/10964A01C, BBS/E/W/10964A01A] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sorghum presents a sustainable feedstock for Mediterranean buffaloes due to its reduced water and nitrogen requirements compared with maize, which is currently fed primarily. We investigated the effects of feeding sorghum as opposed to maize on Mediterranean buffalo rumen microbial diversity and milk fatty acid content. Four cannulated lactating Mediterranean buffalo cows were fed a basal diet for one month before switching either to maize or sorghum-silage based diets for a 3-month period. Buffaloes were then changed over to the contrasting diet for a further one month. Rumen and milk samples were collected at the end of each month. DGGE- and T-RFLP-based dendrograms generated from rumen samples did not show an effect of diet on rumen bacterial diversity. Milk samples also did not differ in terms of their fatty acid content post sorghum feeding as compared with maize feeding. Thus, sorghum provides an environmentally beneficial alternative to maize for feeding Mediterranean buffalo with little effect on rumen microbial diversity or milk fatty acid composition compared with maize feeding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据