4.5 Article

A ligand-pseudoreceptor system based on de novo designed peptides for the generation of adenoviral vectors with altered tropism

期刊

JOURNAL OF GENE MEDICINE
卷 10, 期 4, 页码 355-367

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jgm.1155

关键词

adenovirus; retargeting; packaging cells; pseudoreceptor; gene therapy; fiber

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Delivery of transgenes into specific tissues by adenovirus vectors (AdVs) relies on ablations of their natural tropism and on introduction of a new tropism. If the interaction with its natural receptor is ablated, a new packaging cell line is required to produce the AdV. In the present study, we have used two de novo designed peptides (E-Coil and K-Coil) that interact with each other with high affinity to establish a new receptor-ligand system for the propagation of retargeted AdVs. Methods We produced a cell line (293E) expressing on its surface a pseudoreceptor containing the E-Coil. An AdV (AdFK4m/GFP) lacking the interaction with the primary receptor for adenovirus (CAR) and containing the K-Coil inserted at the fiber C-terminus was constructed and tested using two strategies: (1) an RGD motif (Arg-Gly-Asp) was inserted into the HI-loop of the fiber; (2) AdFK4m/GFP was conjugated to a bispecific adaptor for the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Results AdFK4m/GFP infected 293E cells more efficiently than cells lacking the pseudoreceptor. The transduction was due to the K-Coil/E-Coil specific interaction since it was competed by addition of soluble K-Coil, but not soluble fiber. We demonstrated that the modified AdV was retargeted toward alpha v integrin by inclusion of the RGD motif, or toward EGFR using the bispecific adaptor. Conclusions We have established a new system to produce AdVs ablated of natural tropism. This system should permit the retargeting of AdVs by inserting new ligands within the fiber or through the interaction with bispecific adaptors. Copyright (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据