4.5 Article

Survival Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Surgical Therapy for All Potentially Resectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: a Large Single-Center Cohort Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY
卷 18, 期 3, 页码 562-572

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11605-013-2447-3

关键词

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; Mass-forming type; Hepatic resection; Prognosis; Survival

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Surgical resection is currently indicated for all potentially resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), but the survival outcomes and the prognostic factors have not been well-documented due to its rarity. This study aims to assess these in a large, consecutive series of patients with ICC treated surgically. Methods A retrospective study was conducted on 1,333 ICC patients undergoing surgery between January 2007 and December 2011. Surgical results and survival were evaluated and compared among different subgroups of patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors. Results R0, R1, R2 resection and exploratory laparotomy were obtained in 34.8, 44.9, 16.4, and 3.9 % of the patients, respectively. The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates for the entire cohort were 58.2, 25.2, and 17.0 %, respectively, with corresponding rates of 79.1, 42.6, and 28.7 % for patients with R0 resection; 60.5, 20.1, and 13.9 % for patients with R1 resection; 20.5, 7.4, and 0 % for patients with R2 resection; and 3.8, 0, and 0 % for patients with an exploratory laparotomy. Independent factors for poor survival included positive resection margin, lymph node metastasis, multiple tumors, vascular invasion, and elevated CA19-9 and/or CEA, whereas hepatitis B virus infection and cirrhosis were independently favorable prognosis indicators. Conclusions R0 resection offers the best possibility of long-termsurvival, but the chance of a R0 resection is low when surgery is performed for potential resectable ICC. Further randomized trials are warranted to refine indications for surgery in the management of ICC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据