4.5 Article

High-Fat Diet Enhances Villus Growth During the Adaptation Response to Massive Proximal Small Bowel Resection

期刊

JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY
卷 18, 期 2, 页码 286-294

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11605-013-2338-7

关键词

Short gut syndrome; Small bowel adaptation; High-fat diet; CD36

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health-Morphology and Murine Models Cores of the Digestive Diseases Research Core Center of the Washington University School of Medicine [R01 DK 059288, T32 GM008795, P30DK52574]
  2. Children's Surgical Sciences Institute of the St. Louis Children's Hospital Foundation
  3. Marion and Van Black Endowed Pediatric Surgical Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous studies have shown that high-fat diet (HFD) enhances adaptation if provided immediately following small bowel resection (SBR). The purpose of this study was to determine if HFD could further enhance villus growth after resection-induced adaptation had already taken place. C57/Bl6 mice underwent a 50 % proximal SBR or sham operation and were then provided a standard rodent liquid diet (LD) ad lib. After a typical period of adaptation (7 days), SBR and sham-operated mice were randomized to receive either LD or HFD (42 % kcal fat) for an additional 7 days. Mice were then harvested, and small intestine was collected for analysis. Adaptation occurred in both SBR groups; however, the SBR/HFD had significantly increased villus height compared to SBR/LD. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction of villus enterocytes showed a marked increase in CD36 expression in the SBR/HFD group compared with SBR/LD mice. While exposure to increased enteral fat alone did not affect villus morphology in sham-operated mice, HFD significantly increased villus growth in the setting of resection-induced adaptation, supporting the clinical utility of enteral fat in augmenting adaptation. Increased expression of CD36 suggests a possible mechanistic role in dietary fat metabolism and villus growth in the setting of short gut syndrome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据