4.7 Article

Laser direct micromilling of copper-based bioelectrode with surface microstructure array

期刊

OPTICS AND LASERS IN ENGINEERING
卷 73, 期 -, 页码 7-15

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2015.03.011

关键词

Biomedical electrode; Laser micromilling; Process parameters; Surface microstructures

类别

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundations of China [51475397]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities, Xiamen University [2013121017]
  3. Open Foundation of State Key Laboratory of High-Performance Complex Manufacturing (Central South University) [Kfkt2013-11]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The laser direct micromilling is proposed to fabricate the microstructure arrays on the surface of dry bioelectrodes using red copper material. Based on the principle of laser machining and SEM results, the forming process of microstructure arrays on the surface of copper-based bioelectrodes is discussed. When the process parameters are varied, the effect of process spacing, laser output power, scanning speed and number of scan on the morphology and geometrical dimension of microstructure array of bioelectrode is investigated. The results show that the cone surface microstructure can be fabricated when process spacing is set to 0.1 mm. Surface roughness of microstructure is greatly changed with different scanning speeds. The height of surface microstructure and recast layer is greatly increased with increasing laser output power. When smaller laser output power or less number of scan are selected, surface microstructure array is difficult to be fabricated. However, it is easy to generate the damage of surface microstructure when the larger output power or excessive scanning times are selected. Moreover, our developed copper-based bioelectrode shows a hydrophobic property when the spacings are selected in the range of 0.1-0.3 mm. Eventually, the optimized process parameters are obtained to fabricate the bioelectrode with cone microstructure array. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据