4.7 Article

Parameters optimization of laser brazing in crimping butt using Taguchi and BPNN-GA

期刊

OPTICS AND LASERS IN ENGINEERING
卷 67, 期 -, 页码 94-104

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2014.10.009

关键词

Laser brazing; Bead geometry; Crimping butt; BPNN-GA; Taguchi method

类别

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2014CB046703]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (HUST) [2014QN016]
  3. China Scholarship Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The laser brazing (LB) is widely used in the automotive industry due to the advantages of high speed, small heat affected zone, high quality of welding seam, and low heat input. Welding parameters play a significant role in determining the bead geometry and hence quality of the weld joint. This paper addresses the optimization of the seam shape in LB process with welding crimping butt of 0.8 mm thickness using back propagation neural network (BPNN) and genetic algorithm (GA). A 3-factor, 5-level welding experiment is conducted by Taguchi L-25 orthogonal array through the statistical design method. Then, the input parameters are considered here including welding speed, wire speed rate, and gap with 5 levels. The output results are efficient connection length of left side and right side, top width (WT) and bottom width (WB) of the weld bead. The experiment results are embed into the BPNN network to establish relationship between the input and output variables. The predicted results of the BPNN are fed to GA algorithm that optimizes the process parameters subjected to the objectives. Then, the effects of welding speed (WS), wire feed rate (WF), and gap (GAP) on the sum values of bead geometry is discussed. Eventually, the confirmation experiments are carried out to demonstrate the optimal values were effective and reliable. On the whole, the proposed hybrid method, BPNN-GA, can be used to guide the actual work and improve the efficiency and stability of LB process. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据