4.6 Article

Basal and residual lower esophageal pressures increase in old age in classic achalasia, but not vigorous achalasia

期刊

JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
卷 25, 期 8, 页码 1452-1455

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2010.06298.x

关键词

achalasia; functional gastrointestinal diseases; dysphagia; motility

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Aim: The relationship between age and esophageal motility parameters (i.e. basal and residual pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter [LES]) remains to be established in achalasia patients, possibly because most previous studies did not distinguish between classic and vigorous achalasia patients. We investigated the relationship between age and esophageal motility parameters in both classic and vigorous achalasia patients. Methods: A retrospective review of esophageal manometry data in a single center was undertaken. Basal and residual pressure for LES was analyzed. A total of 103 achalasia patients were enrolled, comprising 84 classic and 19 vigorous types. They were subdivided into three different age groups as follows: 21-40 years old (group A), 41-60 years old (group B), and over 60 years old (group C). Results: In classic achalasia patients (M : F = 27:57, mean age = 44 +/- 15 years old) the older age group showed a significantly higher basal LES pressure (49.62 +/- 19.63 mmHg) than the younger age group (P < 0.0001). Moreover, the older age group also showed significantly high residual LES pressure (20.46 +/- 8.61 mmHg) than the younger age group (P = 0.0006). In contrast, in vigorous achalasia patients (M : F = 12:7, mean age: 47 +/- 15 years old) there were no difference between age and motility indices (all P > 0.05). Conclusion: In classic achalasia patients there appears to be a correlation between age and esophageal motility indices, especially basal and residual LES pressure. Such correlations do not appear to exist for vigorous achalasia patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据