4.6 Article

Effect of being overweight on postoperative morbidity and long-term surgical outcomes in proximal gastric carcinoma

期刊

JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
卷 24, 期 3, 页码 475-479

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2008.05704.x

关键词

gastric cancer; lymph node dissection; morbidity; overweight; prognosis

资金

  1. Korea Science and Engineering Foundation (KOSEF)
  2. Korean government (MOST) [R11-2000-082-02009-0]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [R11-2000-082-02009-0] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The prevalence of being overweight has risen remarkably in Korea. This study sought to clarify the relationship between being overweight and surgical outcomes in gastric cancer patients. A total of 410 patients who underwent curative total gastrectomies with D2 dissection from January 2000 to December 2003 were retrospectively studied from a prospectively designed database. The patients were assigned to two groups based upon their body mass index (BMI): non-overweight, BMI < 25 kg/m(2); overweight, BMI >= 25 kg/m(2). Perioperative surgical outcomes, postoperative morbidity, mortality, recurrence, and prognosis were analyzed. The overweight group had longer operation time and more postoperative complications than the non-overweight group. The two groups were similar in terms of transfusion volumes, postoperative bowel movement, time to initiation of a soft diet, and postoperative hospital stay. Patterns of recurrence and cumulative survival rates were similar for each group. Multivariate analysis showed that being overweight was not a risk factor for recurrence or poor prognosis. Although being overweight was associated with increased operation time and higher risk of complications in gastric cancer patients undergoing curative total gastrectomy, it had no effect on recurrence or long-term survival.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据