4.8 Article

Insights into durable NiCo catalysts on β-SiC/CeZrO2 and γ-Al2O3/CeZrO2 advanced supports prepared from facile methods for CH4-CO2 dry reforming

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 164, 期 -, 页码 100-112

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.09.012

关键词

Bimetallic catalyst; Carbon dioxide; Methane dry reforming; Syngas; CeZrO2 solid solution

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Sport of the Republic of Slovenia [P2-0150]
  2. National Institute of Chemistry, Ljubljana, Slovenia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores CeZrO2 deposited over commercial beta-SiC, and a highly ordered 3D beta-SiC synthesised in the laboratory via electrophoretic deposition, as well as gamma-Al2O3 in order to prepare three types of dual support for NiCo bimetallic catalyst in CH4-CO2 dry reforming (DR). CeZrO2 was deposited over gamma-Al2O3 and beta-SiC by dry impregnation (DI), wet impregnation (WI) and 2-step deposition precipitation (DP). XRD analysis indicated that the constituents of the dual supports were retained after calcination, as well as before and after the DR reaction. CeZrO2 remained as a mixed oxide solid solution, whilst alumina formed spinel structures with Ni and Co before the catalysts were reduced in H-2 during the pretreatment step prior to the activity tests. During 550 h stability tests, WI, 2-step SICAT/CeZrO2 and 2-step gamma-Al2O3/CeZrO2 solids were identified as the most promising catalysts, maintaining high DR activities without deactivation. Notably, 2-step SiC(SICAT) and 2-step gamma-Al2O3/CeZrO2 samples recorded the highest yield (H-2 = 77%, CO = 90%; H-2 = 71%, CO = 81%), with a coke content of 7.7 and 0.6 wt.%, respectively. Carbon deposition for the former is high; contrarily, for WI SiC(SICAT) solid, it accumulated a lower amount of 2.6 wt.%. No agglomeration of CeZrO2 and NiCo phases was observed, evidencing excellent robustness and thermal resistance of these dual supports. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据