4.6 Article

Effects of site substitutions and concentration on the structural, optical and visible photoluminescence properties of Er doped BaTiO3 thin films prepared by RF magnetron sputtering

期刊

OPTICAL MATERIALS
卷 46, 期 -, 页码 304-309

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.optmat.2015.04.036

关键词

BaTiO3; Thin films; RF magnetron sputtering; Structural studies; XPS studies; Photoluminescence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The structural, optical and visible photoluminescence of the Erbium (Er) doped BaTiO3 (BT:Et) thin films were studied in terms of Er3+ substitutions for Ba and Ti sites with different Er3+ doping concentrations (0, 1,3 and 5 wt%). X-ray diffraction pattern of BT:Er:Er films with different Er3+ concentration showed tetragonal phase with preferred orientation along (101) plane. The lattice constant of BT:Er film of 1 wt% Er3+ shrank and then expanded for higher concentration. This indicates that Er3+ ions are completely incorporated into the host lattice by substituting for Ba2+ sites for 1 wt% Er3+ and then Ti4+ sites for higher Er3+ concentration in the BaTiO3 host. The crystallite size decreased for 1 wt% and then increased for higher Er (3 and 5 wt%) concentrations. The Scanning electron microscopy images revealed well patterned arrangement of larger spherical grains with neck formation. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis confirmed the presence of barium, titanium, erbium and oxygen in BT:Er films. An average transmittance >80% in visible region were observed for all the films. Optical band gap energy of BT:Er films were found to vary with increase in Er3+ concentration. The high refractive index >2 of these films can be used in optical application and anti-reflection coatings. Photoluminescence spectra of the films exhibited an increase in the emission intensity up to 3 wt% of Er3+ and then a decrease, due to self quenching. The improved optical properties of BT:Er films makes suitable for optical applications. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据