4.5 Article

Profiling of anthocyanins and carotenoids in fruit peel of different colored mango cultivars

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-MYSORE
卷 55, 期 11, 页码 4566-4577

出版社

SPRINGER INDIA
DOI: 10.1007/s13197-018-3392-7

关键词

Mangifera indica L.; Peel color; Anthocyanins; Carotenoids; UPLC; Fruit ripening

资金

  1. University Grants Commission, New Delhi [RGNF-ST-GOA-7140]
  2. ICAR NPTC Functional genomics
  3. ICAR NPTC Functional genomics...Mango project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mango cultivars are broadly categorized into green, yellow, and red types based on their peel colors. Anthocyanins and carotenoids are the most important pigments responsible for the color of fruits. The information available on the composition of pigments on mango peel was scanty, and the exact role of anthocyanins and carotenoids in imparting peel color was not clear. The present study was aimed at profiling anthocyanin and carotenoid pigments in the peels of green ('Langra', 'Amrapali', 'Hamlet' and 'Bombay No. 1'), yellow ('Arka Anmol', 'Lazzat Baksh', 'Peach' and 'Banganapalli') and red ('Tommy Atkins', 'Lalmuni', 'Gulabi' and lanardhan Pasand') colored mango cultivars through liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry at different stages of ripening. The analysis helped in the identification of eight carotenoids and 24 anthocyanins in mango peel. Higher levels of carotenoids were observed in yellow colored cultivars, and major compounds were beta-carotene and violaxanthin. Further, the red colored types were found to possess the higher anthocyanin content than green and yellow types. The major groups of anthocyanin compounds include cyanidin, peonidin, petunidin, delphinidin and pelargonidin. During fruit ripening, a significant increase in carotenoids content, and no or marginal rise in anthocyanin content was observed in mango peels. The results, show the status of carotenoids and anthocyanins in mango peel of different colored cultivars and their developmental pattern during ripening.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据