4.6 Article

Novel Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitory Peptides Derived from Oncorhynchus mykiss Nebulin: Virtual Screening and In Silico Molecular Docking Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE
卷 83, 期 9, 页码 2375-2383

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.14299

关键词

ACE inhibitory peptides; ADMET; in silico methods; molecular docking; simulated hydrolysis

资金

  1. Natl. Natural Science Funds of China [31771985, 31601479]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Excessive concentrations of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) can give rise to high blood pressure, and is harmful to the body. ACE inhibitory peptides from food proteins are considered good sources of function food. However, the preparation of ACE inhibitory peptides by classical method faces many challenges. Three novel ACE inhibitory peptides were identified by in silico methods, and showed potent activity against ACE in vitro. The simulation hydrolysis of nebulin was performed with ExPASy PeptideCutter program. Potential activity, solubility, and absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity properties of generated peptides were predicted using program online. Molecular docking displayed that EGF, HGR, and VDF were docked into the S-1 and S-2 pockets of ACE. Meanwhile, Phe and Arg at the C-terminal enhance ACE affinity. The IC50 values of EGF, HGR, and VDF were 474.65 0.08, 106.21 +/- 0.52, and 439.27 +/- 0.09 M, respectively. Three peptides EGF, HGR, and VDF from Oncorhynchus mykiss nebulin were identified, and the molecular mechanism between ACE and peptides was clarified using in silico methods. The results suggested that Oncorhynchus mykiss nebulin would be an attractive raw material of antihypertensive nutraceutical ingredients. Practical ApplicationThis study has shown the potential of Oncorhynchus mykiss nebulin as good sources for producing ACE inhibitory peptides. According to this finding, in silico approach is the feasible way for prediction and identification of food-derived ACE inhibitory peptides in emerging nutraceutical field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据