4.6 Article

Comparative Analysis of the Chemical Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Red (Psidium cattleianum) and Yellow (Psidium cattleianum var. lucidum) Strawberry Guava Fruit

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE
卷 76, 期 7, 页码 C991-C996

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02319.x

关键词

essential oils; fatty acids; Psidium cattleianum; polyphenolic compounds; strawberry guava

资金

  1. FAPERGS
  2. CNPq, Brazil

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Strawberry guava (Psidium cattleianum Sabine) is a native fruit of Brazil widely consumed fresh and used in the food industry. In this context, the present study deals with the chemical characterization and the antioxidant activity of the red (Psidium cattleianum) and yellow (P. cattleianum var. lucidum Hort.) strawberry guava fruits, cultivars Irapua and Ya-Cy, respectively. Knowledge of chemical composition is fundamental to human nutrition, contributing to the quality of foods. Phenolic compounds in both fruits were analyzed by HPLC-DAD and the total flavonoid content was determined by the Folin-Ciocalteu assay. The antioxidant activity was evaluated by the total reactive antioxidant (TRAP) method. Psidium cattleianum presented a higher content of polyphenolic compounds than P. cattleianum var. lucidum (501.33 and 292.03 mg/100 g, respectively), with hyperoside being one of the major flavonoids identified for both cultivars. In addition to flavonoids, P. cattleianum presented an anthocyanin, identified as cyanidin. The antioxidant activity varied in a concentration-dependent manner for both strawberry guava species. The volatile oils in fruits and fatty acids in seeds were quantified by GC-EM. The analysis of the essential oil of yellow strawberry guava was compared with a previous study on the red cultivar, revealing beta-caryophyllene as the main component in both oils. The fatty acid composition was also quite similar and was especially characterized by the presence of unsaturated fatty acids (86.25% and 76%, respectively), among which linoleic acid as the most abundant.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据