4.6 Article

Mutagenic Safety and Fatty Liver Improvement of Nanonized Black Soybeans in Senescence-Accelerated Prone-8 Mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE
卷 75, 期 5, 页码 T82-T90

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01638.x

关键词

fatty liver; nanonized black soybean; safety; senescence-accelerated mice

资金

  1. Natl. Science Council, Taiwan [NSC-94-2622-B-126-001-CC3]
  2. Taichung Veterans General Hospital
  3. Providence Univ., Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China [TCVGH-PU978104]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanotechnology, as a new enabling technology, has the potential to revolutionize food systems. However, much attention has been focused on nanoparticle foods due to their potential physiological properties. This study was aimed to evaluate the mutagenic safety and fatty liver improvement of black soybean in senescence-accelerated mice (SAMP8). The mutagenic activity of black soybeans was investigated using the Ames test (Salmonella Typhimurium TA98, 100, 102, and 1535). Furthermore, senescence-accelerated prone-8 mice (SAMP8) have been reported to display spontaneous fatty liver. Male SAMP8 mice were divided into control and supplemented with 10% micronized or nanonized black soybeans diet and fed for 12 wk. The results revealed that the Ames test of micronized and nanonized black soybeans exhibited no mutagenicity. Administration of black soybeans to mice showed no effects on food intake and body and organ weights. The nanonized black soybean group had a lower degree of spontaneous fatty liver, alanine aminotransferase, and thiobarbituric acid-reactive substance concentrations, and had enhanced superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase activities of livers when compared with the SAMP8 control and micronized black soybean groups. The mice fed with black soybeans had significantly lower triglyceride concentrations than the SAMP8 control group. The results of this study suggest that nanonized black soybeans have no side effects and, moreover, may minimize liver lesions in SAMP8 mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据