4.6 Article

Fat Content Influences the Color, Lipid Oxidation, and Volatiles of Irradiated Ground Beef

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE
卷 74, 期 6, 页码 C432-C440

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01207.x

关键词

antioxidants; fat content; ground beef; irradiation; quality parameters

资金

  1. Natl. Integrated Food Safety Initiative/USDA [2002-5110-01957]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ground beef with 10%, 15%, or 20% fat were added with none, 0.05% ascorbic acid + 0.01% alpha-tocopherol, or 0.05% ascorbic acid + 0.01% alpha-tocopherol + 0.01% sesamol, and irradiated at 0 or 2.5 kGy. The meat samples were displayed under fluorescent light for 14 d at 4 degrees C. Color, lipid oxidation, volatiles, oxidation-reduction potential (ORP), and carbon monoxide (CO) production were determined during storage. Irradiation increased lipid oxidation and total volatiles of ground beef regardless of fat contents. Ascorbic acid + alpha-tocopherol + sesamol treatment was the most effective in reducing lipid oxidation during storage. The production of ethanol in nonirradiated ground beef increased dramatically after 7 d of storage due to microbial growth. Total aldehydes and hexanal increased drastically in irradiated control over the storage period, but hexanal increased the most by irradiation. L* - values was decreased by irradiation, but increased in all meat regardless of fat contents as storage period increased. Irradiation reduced the redness, but fat contents had no effect on the a* -value of ground beef. Sesamol lowered, but ascorbic acid + alpha-tocopherol maintained the redness of irradiated beef up to 2wk of storage. The yellowness of meat was significantly decreased by irradiation. The reducing power of ascorbic acid + alpha-tocopherol lasted for 3 d, after which ORP values increased. Irradiation increased CO production regardless of fat content in ground beef. In conclusion, up to 20% fat had no effect on the quality change of irradiated ground beef if ascorbic acid + alpha-tocopherol was added.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据