4.6 Article

Endogenous factors affecting oxidative stability of beef loin, pork loin, and chicken breast and thigh meats

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE
卷 73, 期 6, 页码 C439-C446

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.00805.x

关键词

DPPH radical scavenging activity; ferric ion reducing capacity; iron; lipid oxidation; lipoxygenase-like activity

资金

  1. Natl. Integrated Food Safety Initiative/USDA, Washington, D.C. [2002-5110-01957]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The susceptibility of meats from different animal species (chicken breast [CB] and thigh [CT], pork [PL], and beef [BL]) to lipid oxidation was studied. The amounts of TBARS in raw PL, CB, and CT did not change during a 7-d storage period. TBARS values of raw BL, however, significantly increased during 7-d storage because of high heme iron content, high lipoxygenase-like activities, and low 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activities. Ferric ion reducing capacities (FRC) were detected in all raw meats, but their characteristics were different: storage-unstable in CB and CT and storage-stable in PL and BL. Ferric ion reducing capacities in raw CB and CT was higher than those of PL and BL, and could be related to their high oxidative stability. The TBARS values of cooked meat increased significantly with storage. The rates of TBARS increase in cooked CT and BL were significantly higher than those of cooked CB and PL after a 7-d storage. Nonheme iron content in cooked BL was higher than other meats and increased significantly after 7 d. Cooked BL had a higher amount of heat-stable FRC, which acted as a prooxidant in the presence of high free ionic irons, than other meats. Therefore, high heat-stable FRC and increased nonheme Iron content in cooked BL were responsible for its high susceptibility to lipid oxidation. Despite relatively low nonheme iron and heat-stable FRC levels, cooked CT showed similar levels of TBARS to cooked BL after a 7-d storage because of its high PUFA content.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据