4.2 Article

SIMULTANEOUS DETECTION OF LISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES, STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS, SALMONELLA ENTERICA AND ESCHERICHIA COLI O157:H7 IN FOOD SAMPLES USING MULTIPLEX PCR METHOD

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD SAFETY
卷 29, 期 3, 页码 348-363

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-4565.2009.00161.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology P.R. China [2005CB120802]
  2. national high-tech project 863 [2006AA10Z443, 2007AA10Z418]
  3. Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project [B205]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, one multiplex polymerase chain reaction (MPCR) assay was developed for simultaneous detection of four foodborne pathogens, i.e., Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli O157:H7. Five specific primer pairs were designed based on the nucleotide sequences of hemolysin gene (hly) of Listeria monocytogenes, thermostable nuclease gene (nuc) of Staphylococcus aureus, invasion gene (invA) of Salmonella enterica, shiga-like toxin gene (stx) and intimin gene (eae) of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in this assay. The specificity and sensitivity of the MPCR method were validated, and the limit of detection (LOD) of this method was about 10 copies. One cfu/mL each of these foodborne pathogens spiked in practical food samples, i.e., ground meat, beef, pork, fish, shrimp, cheese, canola leaf and cabbage, could be detected simultaneously after 24 h enrichment at a rate of 87.5%, indicating that the established MPCR detection method was effective and suitable for practical use. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS This study presents a quick and effective identification method to simultaneous monitor four foodborne pathogens in food samples. The specificity and sensitivity of this method can be used to unambiguously identify these four foodborne pathogens in practical food samples based on the species-specific genes. Therefore, this detection method is applicable for surveillance measures of these four foodborne pathogens in the food production chain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据