4.4 Article

Prevalence, Antibiograms, and Transferable tet(O) Plasmid of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli Isolated from Raw Chicken, Pork, and Human Clinical Cases in Korea

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION
卷 73, 期 8, 页码 1430-1437

出版社

INT ASSOC FOOD PROTECTION
DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X-73.8.1430

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Korea [203112-3]
  2. Korean Ministry of Commerce, Industry Energy [2005-B0000002]
  3. Research Institute of Veterinary Science, Department of Veterinary Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and the Brain Korea 21 Program for Veterinary Science at Seoul National University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The antibiotic resistance patterns and prevalence of the transferable tet(O) plasmid were investigated in Campylobacter jejunt and Campylobacter colt isolates from raw chicken, pork. and humans with clinical campylobacteriosis A total of 180 C jejunt and C colt isolates were identified, and the prevalence rates of C jejum and C colt in raw chicken samples were 83% (83 of 100) and 73% (73 of 100). respectively. Twelve percent (6 of 50) and 10% (5 of 50) of pork samples were contaminated with C jejum and C colt, respectively. Disk diffusion susceptibility testing revealed that the most frequently detected resistance was to tetracycline (92.2%). followed by nalidixic acid (75 6%), ciprofloxacin (65 0%). azithromycin (41.5%), ampicillin (33 3%). and streptomycin (26 1%). Of the C mum and C coli isolates, 65 7% (n = 109) contained plasmids carrying the tet(O) gene Six C jejum isolates and two C colt isolates with high-level resistance to tetracycline (MIC = 256 mu g/ml) harbored the tet(O) plasmid, which is transferable to other C jejum and C colt isolates. These results demonstrate the presence of an interspecies transferable plasmid containing the ten(O) gene and a high prevalence of antibiotic resistance in Korean Campylobacter isolates and provide an understanding of the antibiotic resistance distribution among Campylobacter species in Korea.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据