4.4 Article

Effect of Chitosan on the Infectivity of Murine Norovirus, Feline Calicivirus, and Bacteriophage MS2

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION
卷 72, 期 12, 页码 2623-2628

出版社

INT ASSOC FOOD PROTECTION
DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X-72.12.2623

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chitosan is known to inhibit microorganisms of concern to plants, animals, and humans. However, the effect of chitosan on human enteric viruses of public health concern has not been extensively investigated. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of chitosan on three human enteric viral surrogates: murine norovirus 1 (MNV-1), feline calicivirus F-9 (FCV-179), and (ssRNA) bacteriophage MS2 (MS2). Chitosan oligosaccharide lactate (molecular weight of 5,000) and water-soluble chitosan (molecular weight of 53,000) at concentrations of 1.4, 0.7, and 0.35% were incubated at 37 degrees C for 3 h with equal volumes of each virus at high (similar to 7 log PFU/ml) and low (similar to 5 log PFU/ml) titers. Chitosan effects on each treated virus were evaluated with standardized plaque assays in comparison to untreated virus controls. The water-soluble chitosan at 0.7% decreased the FCV-F9 titer by similar to 2.83 log PFU/ml, with decreasing effects at lower concerti rations, and also decreased MS2 at high liters by similar to 1.18 to 1.41 log PFU/ml, regardless of the concentration used. Chitosan treatments at the concentrations Studied had no effect on MNV-1 at high titers. Chitosan oligosaccharide showed similar trends against the viruses, but to a lesser extent compared with that of water-soluble chitosan. When lower virus titers (similar to 5 log PFU/ml) were used, plaque reduction was observed for FCV-F9 and MS2, but not MNV-1. The use of higher-molecular-weight chitosan and at higher concentrations with longer incubation may be necessary to inactivate MNV-1. These results in the plaque reduction of human enteric virus surrogates by chitosan treatment show promise for its potential application in the food environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据