4.4 Article

Antioxidant Activity of Gelatin Hydrolysate Produced from Fish Skin Gelatin Using Extracellular Protease from Bacillus amyloliquefaciensH11

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD PROCESSING AND PRESERVATION
卷 39, 期 4, 页码 394-403

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/jfpp.12244

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research University Project of Thailand's Office of the Higher Education Commission
  2. TRF Senior Research Scholar Program
  3. Graduate School, Prince of Songkla University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antioxidant activities of gelatin hydrolysates (GHs) from unicorn leatherjacket skin prepared using extracellular protease from Bacillus amyloliquefaciensH11 (GH-H11) with different degrees of hydrolysis (DHs) were comparatively studied with those of hydrolysate produced using Alcalase (GH-Al). Antioxidative activities of hydrolysates produced by both proteases increased with increasing DH (P<0.05). With DHs of 20-40%, GH-H11 showed higher 2,2-azinobis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) radical-scavenging activity and ferric-reducing antioxidant power than GH-Al (P<0.05), but no differences in chelating activity were found (P>0.05). Both hydrolysates (100 and 1,000ppm) could inhibit lipid peroxidation in lecithin liposome system in a dose-dependent manner. In vitro simulated gastrointestinal digestion study indicated that the antioxidative activity of GH was not affected by pepsin, while further hydrolysis by pancreatin enhanced the antioxidative activity. The dominant antioxidative peptides in GH-H11 and GH-Al had molecular weights of approximately 750 and 3,600Da, respectively. Practical ApplicationsBacillus amyloliquefaciensH11 protease could hydrolyze gelatin more effectively than Alcalase. Gelatin hydrolysate using B.amyloliquefaciensH11 protease had high antioxidant activity than that prepared by Alcalase. Antioxidative peptide could be useful for the food industry owing to process specificity and the economic value of producing bioactive peptide for commercial use.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据