4.6 Article

Diabetes, Fasting Glucose, and the Risk of Glaucoma A Meta-analysis

期刊

OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 122, 期 1, 页码 72-78

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.07.051

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Topic: We performed a systematic review to summarize the association of diabetes and blood glucose levels with glaucoma, intraocular pressure (IOP), and ocular hypertension in the general population. Clinical Relevance: Diabetes has been proposed as a risk factor for glaucoma, but epidemiologic studies have been inconsistent, and the association is still controversial. Furthermore, no systematic reviews evaluated other metabolic abnormalities, such as the metabolic syndrome, with the risk of glaucoma. Methods: We identified the studies by searching the PubMed and EMBASE databases. We used inversevariance weighted random-effects models to summarize relative risks across studies. Results: We identified 47 studies including 2 981 342 individuals from 16 countries. The quality of evidence generally was higher in the cohort compared with case-control or cross-sectional studies. The pooled relative risk for glaucoma comparing patients with diabetes with those without diabetes was 1.48 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-1.71), with significant heterogeneity across studies (I-2 = 82.3%; P < 0.001). The risk of glaucoma increased by 5% (95% CI, 1%-9%) for each year since diabetes diagnosis. The pooled average difference in IOP comparing patients with diabetes with those without diabetes was 0.18 mmHg (95% CI, 0.09-0.27; I-2 = 73.2%), whereas the pooled average increase in IOP associated with an increase in 10 mg/dl in fasting glucose was 0.09 mmHg (95% CI, 0.05-0.12; I-2 = 34.8%). Conclusions: Diabetes, diabetes duration, and fasting glucose levels were associated with a significantly increased risk of glaucoma, and diabetes and fasting glucose levels were associated with slightly higher IOP. (C) 2015 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据