4.4 Article

PECTIN-BASED EDIBLE COATING FOR SHELF-LIFE EXTENSION OF ATAULFO MANGO

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD PROCESS ENGINEERING
卷 35, 期 4, 页码 572-600

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-4530.2010.00609.x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mango is a commercial but highly perishable fruit, and therefore, a longer shelf life is necessary for its successful marketing and consumer satisfaction. This study aims at evaluating the effects of edible coating, based on pectin, on the quality and shelf-life extension of mangoes. The coating formulations included different combinations of pectin, beeswax, sorbitol and monoglyceride. The fruits were coated and stored at room temperature along with uncoated controls. Samples tested were evaluated periodically for quality parameters, which included visual observation, weight loss, respiration rate, color, firmness, pH, soluble solids (SS), titrable acidity and extent of decay. The coated-fruits reduced the rate of color development, texture softening, weight loss, CO2 evolution and acid production (only pH and SS increased) compared with the control. The shelf life of control sample was less than a week, whereas the coated fruits remained good for over 2 weeks, thereby offering a significant advantage. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS The study evaluates the use of pectin-based edible coating for extending the shelf life of mango. The formulation is a blend of hydrophilic and hydrophobic groups to provide controlled respiration and water vapor permeability. The properties of pectin films have been highlighted in a previous paper, and several applications based on the coating have been demonstrated. The present study demonstrates that modifications to the formulation were necessary in order to successfully apply it to mango. Mango is a popular commercial product with high heritability. Simple edible coatings that can help to improve the shelf life and marketability of the product will be of significant interest in the marketing of mango products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据