4.7 Article

Enhanced extraction of flavanones hesperidin and narirutin from Citrus unshiu peel using subcritical water

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD ENGINEERING
卷 110, 期 3, 页码 472-477

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2011.12.019

关键词

Citrus unshiu peel; Hesperidin; Narirutin; Subcritical water extraction (SWE)

资金

  1. Ewha Womans University
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  3. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2010-0021890]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-0021890] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Flavanones including hesperidin and narirutin constitute the majority of the flavonoids that occur naturally in citrus fruits. The main purpose of this study was to extract valuable natural flavanones from agricultural by-products such as citrus peels using subcritical water extraction (SWE). Thus, the application of SWE to extraction of flavanones hesperidin and narirutin. from Citrus unshiu peel was evaluated, and the effect of key operating conditions was determined by varying the extraction temperature (110-200 degrees C) and time (5-20 min) under high pressure (100 +/- 10 atm). The maximum yields of hesperidin (72 +/- 5 mg/g C unshiu peel) and narirutin (11.7 +/- 0.8 mg/g C. unshiu peel) were obtained at an extraction temperature of 160 degrees C for an extraction time of only 10 min. These yields accounted for approximately 99% of the total amount of these flavanones in the original material. The SWE was compared with three conventional extraction methods in terms of the extraction time and recovery yields for hesperidin and narirutin. The hesperidin yield by SWE was more than 1.9-, 3.2-, and 34.2-fold higher than those obtained by extraction methods using ethanol, methanol, or hot water, respectively, and the narirutin yield was more than 1.2-, 1.5-, and 3.7-fold higher. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据