4.7 Article

Adiabatic compression heating coefficients for high-pressure processing - A study of some insulating polymer materials

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD ENGINEERING
卷 98, 期 1, 页码 110-119

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2009.12.016

关键词

High pressure processing; High pressure thermal; Compression heating; Adiabatic heating; Thermophysical properties; Insulating polymers; Insulating baskets; Insulating carriers

资金

  1. Victorian State Government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In high-pressure processing (HPP), equipment design has largely been based on trial-and-error experimentation. For the design of the insulating carrier in high-pressure thermal (HPT) processing, it is imperative to know the extent of compression heating of the materials used, to achieve the best combination of insulation, compression heating and other design features to give the most uniform temperature treatment to the product. In this study, the compression heating properties of high-density polyethylene (HDPE), polypropylene (PP) and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) during high-pressure processing were investigated under near-adiabatic conditions. The plastic polymers were pressurised at varying initial temperatures (5-90 degrees C) up to 750 MPa. Pressure/temperature profiles were recorded and numerically analysed with a purpose-developed software algorithm to obtain pressure- and temperature-dependent compression heating properties. Pronounced differences in compression heating behaviour of the plastics were found, which may be explained by their thermophysical properties, including density and thermal expansion. and the polymers' base structure and apparent structural changes during treatment. We propose an approach for the screening and selection of suitable insulating plastics for high-pressure processing (HPP) that takes account of the food material to be processed and the process conditions, i.e., initial and target temperature, and pressure level. Crown Copyright (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据