4.7 Article

Thermal transitions of rice: Development of a state diagram

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD ENGINEERING
卷 90, 期 1, 页码 110-118

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.06.008

关键词

basmati rice; cooling curve method; enthalpy; modulated differential scanning calorimeter (MDSC); glass transition temperature; maximal-freeze-concentration; water adsorption isotherms

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A state diagram of basmati rice was developed by measuring the glass line; glass transition temperature vs. solids content, freezing curve; initial freezing point vs. solids content and maximally freeze concentrated conditions by using the modulated differential scanning calorimetry (MDSC) method. In addition, a cooling curve method was used to measure the initial freezing point (TF) and the end point of freezing (T'(m)). The glass transition line of the state diagram was modeled using the Gordon-Taylor and linear equations, and the pattern of freezing curve was modeled using the Chen equation which incorporated unfreezable water. The condition of maximal-freeze-concentration corresponded to X, (characteristic solids content) = 0.60 and T'(m) (end point of freezing) = -3.6 degrees C obtained from freezing curve. The characteristics glass transition T'(g) = -7.1 degrees C and corresponding solids content X ''(s) = 0.66 were obtained by extending the freezing curve up to glass line modeled using linear equation. The T'(g) = -11.6 degrees C and X ''(s) = 0.82 were obtained when the glass line was modeled using Gordon-Taylor equation. Adsorption isotherms of rice were measured at room temperature by isopiestic method and data were modeled with BET and CAB equations. The BET and GAB monolayer values were found as 0.083 and 0.136 kg H2O/kg dry solids, respectively. The state diagram and water sorption properties of basmati rice can be useful in optimizing the drying and freezing processes as well as studying the physicochemical changes during storage. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据