4.5 Article

WILD OLIVE (OLEA EUROPAEA L.) SELECTION FOR QUALITY OIL PRODUCTION

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 35, 期 1, 页码 161-176

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-4514.2010.00373.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Tunisian Ministry of High Education, Scientific Research and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One hundred and fifty accessions belong to six wild olive populations from Tunisia were analyzed using fruit pomological traits and oil chemical characteristics. Analysis of variance revealed significant differences among olive accessions for the main studied parameters, indicating a high degree of variability among oleasters. Cluster analysis revealed no clear relationships between accessions according to their geographical origin. Among the screened oleasters, three stand out for their interesting oil parameters, as compared to traditional varieties with high oleic and low linoleic acid contents, high triolein level, large total phenol content, high oxidative stability and high oil content. ZI2 had the highest values of oleic acid (78.5%), whereas H3 was noteworthy for its higher content of phenolic compounds (435.3 mg/kg). Accordingly, oil from H3 presented the highest oxidative stability (83.5 h). A significant relationship was observed between phenolic compounds and oxidative stability. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS The identification of new cultivars and their oil composition is a key point in the improvement of olive oil production. This is the first study of chemical composition of virgin olive oils from wild olives. The paper is a study on the quality characteristics of olive oils obtained from wild olive trees growing in Tunisia to define new cultivars well adapted to Tunisian environment and yielding high quality oils. Although the study was carried out in Tunisia, it might be applied to other countries with wild olive trees, in order to contrast productivity and oil quality with those resulting from native cultivars and transplanted foreign varieties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据