4.5 Article

Local flow field of a surface-mounted finite circular cylinder

期刊

JOURNAL OF FLUIDS AND STRUCTURES
卷 34, 期 -, 页码 105-122

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2012.04.014

关键词

Bluff body; Finite circular cylinder; Wake; Separated flow; Experimental fluid mechanics; Particle image velocimetry

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The local flow field and near-wake region of a surface-mounted finite circular cylinder were studied experimentally in a low-speed wind tunnel using particle image velocimetry (PIV). The cylinder was mounted normal to a ground plane and was partially immersed in a flat-plate turbulent boundary layer. Four finite circular cylinders of aspect ratios AR=9, 7, 5 and 3 were tested at a Reynolds number of Re-D=4.2 x 10(4). At the location of the cylinder, the boundary layer thickness relative to the cylinder diameter was delta/D=1.6. PIV velocity field measurements were made in a vertical plane parallel to the mean flow direction on the flow centerline (the symmetry plane), within five diameters upstream and downstream of the cylinder, and also above the free end. Above the free end of the cylinder, flow separation from the leading edge leads to the formation of a mean recirculation zone on the free-end surface. The point of reattachment of the flow onto the free-end surface moves towards the trailing edge as the cylinder aspect ratio is decreased. Large regions of elevated turbulence intensity and Reynolds shear stress are found above the free end. In the near-wake region, the large recirculation zone contains a vortex immediately behind and below the free end; this vortex was found for all four aspect ratios. A second vortex is found behind the cylinder near the cylinder-wall junction; this vortex was not observed for the cylinder of AR=3, indicating a distinct wake structure for this cylinder. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据