4.7 Article

Flow instabilities in the wide-gap spherical Couette system

期刊

JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS
卷 738, 期 -, 页码 184-221

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2013.545

关键词

free shear layers; instability; rotating flows

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The spherical Couette system is a spherical shell filled with a viscous fluid. Flows are driven by the differential rotation between the inner and the outer boundary that rotate with Omega and Omega + Delta Omega about a common axis. This setup has been proposed for second-generation dynamo experiments. We numerically explore the different instabilities emerging for rotation rates up to Omega = (1/3) x 10(7), venturing also into the nonlinear regime where oscillatory and chaotic solutions are found. The results provide a comprehensive overview of the possible flow regimes. For low values of Omega viscosity dominates and an equatorial jet in meridional circulation and zonal flow develops that becomes unstable as the differential rotation is increased beyond a critical value. For intermediate Omega and an inner boundary rotating slower than the outer one, new double-roll and helical instabilities are found. For large Omega values Coriolis effects enforce a nearly two-dimensional fundamental flow where a Stewartson shear layer develops at the tangent cylinder. This shear layer is the source of nearly geostrophic non-axisymmetric instabilities that resemble columnar Rossby modes. At first, the instabilities differ significantly depending on whether the inner boundary rotates faster (Delta Omega > 0) or slower (Delta Omega < 0) than the outer one. For very large outer boundary rotation rates, however, both instabilities once more become comparable. Fast inertial waves similar to those observed in recent spherical Couette experiments prevail for larger Omega values and Delta Omega < 0 in when Delta Omega and Omega are of comparable magnitude. For larger differential rotations Delta Omega >> Omega, however, the equatorial jet instability always takes over.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据