4.7 Article

Multiscale modelling of erythrocytes in Stokes flow

期刊

JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS
卷 686, 期 -, 页码 299-337

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2011.332

关键词

capsule/cell dynamics; microfluidics

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute [R01HL092793]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To quantitatively understand the correlation between the molecular structure of an erythrocyte (red blood cell, RBC) and its mechanical response, and to predict mechanically induced structural remodelling in physiological conditions, we developed a computational model by coupling a multiscale approach of RBC membranes with a boundary element method (BEM) for surrounding Stokes flows. The membrane is depicted at three levels: in the whole cell level, a finite element method (FEM) is employed to model the lipid bilayer and the cytoskeleton as two distinct layers of continuum shells. The mechanical properties of the cytoskeleton are obtained from a molecular-detailed model of the junctional complex. The spectrin, a major protein of the cytoskeleton, is simulated using a molecular-based constitutive model. The BEM model is coupled with the FEM model through a staggered coupling algorithm. Using this technique, we first simulated RBC dynamics in capillary flow and found that the protein density variation and bilayer-skeleton interaction forces are much lower than those in micropipette aspiration, and the maximum interaction force occurs at the trailing edge. Then we investigated mechanical responses of RBCs in shear flow during tumbling, tank-treading and swinging motions. The dependencies of tank-treading frequency on the blood plasma viscosity and the membrane viscosity we found match well with benchmark data. The simulation results show that during tank-treading the protein density variation is insignificant for healthy erythrocytes, but significant for cells with a smaller bilayer-skeleton friction coefficient, which may be the case in hereditary spherocytosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据