4.5 Article

Resveratrol sensitizes glioblastoma-initiating cells to temozolomide by inducing cell apoptosis and promoting differentiation

期刊

ONCOLOGY REPORTS
卷 35, 期 1, 页码 343-351

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/or.2015.4346

关键词

glioblastoma-initiating cells; resveratrol; temozolomide; chemoresistance; combination

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81102463]
  2. China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases
  3. Training Plan for Beijing High-Level Healthcare Personnel [2011-3-28]
  4. Capital Medical University Clinical-Basic Cooperation Research [11JL16]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glioblastoma-initiating cells play crucial roles in the origin, growth, and recurrence of glioblastoma multi-forme. The elimination of glioblastoma-initiating cells is believed to be a key strategy for achieving long-term survival of glioblastoma patients due to the highly resistant property of glioblastoma-initiating cells to temozolomide. Resveratrol, a naturally occurring polyphenol, has been widely studied as a promising candidate for cancer prevention and treatment. Whether resveratrol could enhance the sensitivity of glioblastoma-initiating cells to temozolomide therapy has not yet been reported. Here, using patient-derived glioblastoma-initiating cell lines, we found that resveratrol sensitized glioblastoma-initiating cells to temozolomide both in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, we showed that resveratrol enhanced glioblastoma-initiating cells to temozolomide-induced apoptosis through DNA double-stranded breaks/pATM/pATR/p53 pathway activation, and promoted glioblastoma-initiating cell differentiation involving p-STAT3 inactivation. Our results propose that temozolomide and resveratrol combination strategy may be effective in the management of glioblastoma patients, particularly for those patients who have been present with a high abundance of glioblastoma-initiating cells in their tumors and show slight responsiveness to temozolomide.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据