4.6 Article

Development of a job-exposure matrix for exposure to total and fine particulate matter in the aluminum industry

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/jes.2013.53

关键词

particulate matter; exposure modeling; inhalation exposure; personal exposure

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health, Institute of Aging (Disease, Disability and Death in an Aging Workforce: The Alcoa Study) [5R01 AG026291-06]
  2. Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health [5R01OH009939-02]
  3. Alcoa, Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increasing evidence indicates that exposure to particulate matter (PM) at environmental concentrations increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, particularly PM with an aerodynamic diameter of less than 2.5 mu m (PM2.5). Despite this, the health impacts of higher occupational exposures to PM2.5 have rarely been evaluated. In part, this research gap derives from the absence of information on PM2.5 exposures in the workplace. To address this gap, we have developed a job-exposure matrix (JEM) to estimate exposure to two size fractions of PM in the aluminum industry. Measurements of total PM (TPM) and PM2.5 were used to develop exposure metrics for an epidemiologic study. TPM exposures for distinct exposure groups (DEGs) in the JEM were calculated using 8385 personal TPM samples collected at 11 facilities (1980-2011). For eight of these facilities, simultaneous PM2.5 and TPM personal monitoring was conducted from 2010 to 2011 to determine the percent of TPM that is composed of PM2.5 (%PM2.5) in each DEG. The mean TPM from the JEM was then multiplied by %PM2.5 to calculate PM2.5 exposure concentrations in each DEG. Exposures in the smelters were substantially higher than in fabrication units; mean TPM concentrations in smelters and fabrication facilities were 3.86 and 0.76 mg/m(3), and the corresponding mean PM2.5 concentrations were 2.03 and 0.40 mg/m(3). Observed occupational exposures in this study generally exceeded environmental PM2.5 concentrations by an order of magnitude.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据