4.6 Article

Metal sources and exposures in the homes of young children living near a mining-impacted Superfund site

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/jes.2011.21

关键词

house dust; indoor air pollution; metals; mine waste; residential exposures; Tar Creek Superfund Site

资金

  1. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) [P42-ES016454, K23 ES000381]
  2. NIEHS Center [2 P30-ES 00002]
  3. NIEHS Children's Center [1 P01-ES012874]
  4. US EPA STAR Research Assistance Agreement [RD-83172501]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Children living near hazardous waste sites may be exposed to environmental contaminants, yet few studies have conducted multi-media exposure assessments, including residential environments where children spend most of their time. We sampled yard soil, house dust, and particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter o2.5 in 59 homes of young children near an abandoned mining area and analyzed samples for lead (Pb), zinc (Zn), cadmium (Cd), arsenic (As), and manganese (Mn). In over half of the homes, dust concentrations of Pb, Zn, Cd, and As were higher than those in soil. Proximity to mine waste (chat) piles and the presence of chat in the driveway significantly predicted dust metals levels. Homes with both chat sources had Pb, Zn, Cd, and As dust levels two to three times higher than homes with no known chat sources after controlling for other sources. In contrast, Mn concentrations in dust were consistently lower than in soil and were not associated with chat sources. Mn dust concentrations were predicted by soil concentrations and occupant density. These findings suggest that nearby outdoor sources of metal contaminants from mine waste may migrate indoors. Populations farther away from the mining site may also be exposed if secondary uses of chat are in close proximity to the home. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology (2011) 21, 495-505; doi: 10.1038/jes.2011.21; published online 18 May 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据