4.6 Article

Potential for exposure to engineered nanoparticles from nanotechnology-based consumer spray products

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/jes.2011.10

关键词

aerosolization; nanoaerosol; emerging contaminants; particulate matter; inhalation exposure; personal exposure

资金

  1. NIEHS, UMDNJ Center for Environmental Exposures and Disease [NIEHS P30ES005022]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The potential for human exposure to engineered nanoparticles due to the use of nanotechnology-based consumer sprays (categorized as such by the Nanotechnology Consumer Products Inventory) is examined along with analogous products, which are not specified as nanotechnology-based (regular products). Photon correlation spectroscopy was used to obtain particle size distributions in the initial liquid products. Transmission electron microscopy was used to determine particle size, shape, and agglomeration of the particles. Realistic application of the spray products near the human breathing zone characterized airborne particles that are released during use of the sprays. Aerosolization of sprays with standard nebulizers was used to determine their potential for inhalation exposure. Electron microscopy detected the presence of nanoparticles in some nanotechnology-based sprays as well as in several regular products, whereas the photon correlation spectroscopy indicated the presence of particles <100nm in all investigated products. During the use of most nanotechnology-based and regular sprays, particles ranging from 13 nm to 20 mm were released, indicating that they could he inhaled and consequently deposited in all regions of the respiratory system. The results indicate that exposures to nanoparticles as well as micrometer-sized particles can be encountered owing to the use of nanotechnology-based sprays as well as regular spray products. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology (2011) 21, 515-528; doi: 10.1038/jes.2011.10; published online 2 March 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据