4.6 Article

Determinants of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon levels in house dust

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/jes.2009.68

关键词

cancer; child exposure/health; empirical/statistical models; environmental monitoring; polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

资金

  1. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [R01ES009137, P42ES0470518]
  2. National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Health [7590-S-04, 7590-S-01]
  3. National Cancer Institute [N02-CP-11015]
  4. Berkeley Fellowship for Graduate Study

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Estimation of human exposures to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) is often desired for the epidemiological studies of cancer. One way to obtain information about indoor levels of PAHs is to measure these chemicals in house dust. In this study, we evaluated the predictive value of self-reported and geographic data for estimating measured levels of nine PAHs in house dust from 583 households in the Northern California Childhood Leukemia Study (NCCLS). Using multivariable linear regression models, we evaluated the effects on house-dust PAH concentrations from the following covariates: residential heating sources, smoking habits, house characteristics, and outdoor emission sources. House dust was collected from 2001 to 2007, using both high-volume surface samplers and household vacuum cleaners, and was analyzed for nine PAHs using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. All nine PAHs were detected in more than 93% of dust samples, with median concentrations ranging from 14 to 94 ng/g dust. Statistically significant effects on PAH concentrations in house dust were found for gas heating, outdoor PAH concentrations, and residence age. Yet, the optimal regression model only explained 15% of the variation in PAH levels in house dust. As self-reported data and outdoor PAH sources were only marginally predictive of observed PAH levels, we recommend that PAH concentrations be measured directly in dust samples for use in epidemiological studies. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology (2011) 21, 123-132; doi:10.1038/jes.2009.68; published online 30 December 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据