4.3 Article

Effect of ionic strength solution on the stability of chitosan-DNA nanoparticles

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL NANOSCIENCE
卷 8, 期 5, 页码 539-552

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17458080.2011.602120

关键词

chitosan; nanoparticles; gene therapy; DNA

资金

  1. Fapesp (Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo) [2007/00339-7]
  2. CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico)
  3. Fapesp

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ChitosanDNA nanoparticles employed in gene therapy protocols consist of a neutralised, stoichiometric core and a shell of the excess of chitosan which stabilises the particles against further coagulation. At low ionic strength, these nanoparticles possess a high stability; however, as the ionic strength increases, it weakens the electrostatic repulsion which can play a decisive part in the formation of highly aggregated particles. In this study, new results about the effect of ionic strength on the colloidal stability of chitosanDNA nanoparticles were obtained by studying the interaction between chitosans of increasing molecular weights (5, 10, 16, 29, 57 and 150kDa) and calf thymus DNA. The physicochemical properties of polyplexes were investigated by means of dynamic light scattering, static fluorescence spectroscopy, optic microscopy, transmission electronic microscopy and gel electrophoresis. After subsequent addition of salt to the nanoparticles solution, secondary aggregation increased the size of the polyplexes. The nanoparticles stability decreased drastically at the ionic strengths 150 and 500mM, which caused the corresponding decrease in the thickness of the stabilising shell. The morphologies of chitosan/DNA nanoparticles at those ionic strengths were a mixture of large spherical aggregates, toroids and rods. The results indicated that to obtain stable chitosanDNA nanoparticles, besides molecular weight and N/P ratio, it is quite important to control the ionic strength of the solution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据