4.7 Article

USP21 negatively regulates antiviral response by acting as a RIG-I deubiquitinase

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
卷 211, 期 2, 页码 313-328

出版社

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1084/jem.20122844

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health-NINDS [1R01NS072420, 1R21NS085467]
  2. National Basic Research Program [2013CB967500]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31170824]
  4. Basic Research Project of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission [13JC1405400]
  5. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20120072110016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lys63-linked polyubiquitination of RIG-I is essential in antiviral immune defense, yet the molecular mechanism that negatively regulates this critical step is poorly understood. Here, we report that USP21 acts as a novel negative regulator in antiviral responses through its ability to bind to and deubiquitinate RIG-I. Overexpression of USP21 inhibited RNA virus-induced RIG-I polyubiquitination and RIG-I-mediated interferon (IFN) signaling, whereas deletion of USP21 resulted in elevated RIG-I polyubiquitination, IRF3 phosphorylation, IFN-alpha/beta production, and antiviral responses in MEFs in response to RNA virus infection. USP21 also restricted antiviral responses in peritoneal macrophages (PMs) and bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDCs). USP21-deficient mice spontaneously developed splenomegaly and were more resistant to VSV infection with elevated production of IFNs. Chimeric mice with USP21-deficient hematopoietic cells developed virus-induced splenomegaly and were more resistant to VSV infection. Functional comparison of three deubiquitinases (USP21, A20, and CYLD) demonstrated that USP21 acts as a bona fide RIG-I deubiquitinase to down-regulate antiviral response independent of the A20 ubiquitin-editing complex. Our studies identify a previously unrecognized role for USP21 in the negative regulation of antiviral response through deubiquitinating RIG-I.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据