4.7 Article

Deficiency for endoglin in tumor vasculature weakens the endothelial barrier to metastatic dissemination

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
卷 210, 期 3, 页码 563-579

出版社

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1084/jem.20120662

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Cancer Society
  2. StratCan
  3. ERC
  4. Swedish Research Council [K2011-67X-21865-01-6]
  5. Swedish Childhood Cancer Society
  6. Jeansson's Foundation
  7. Magn Bergvalls Foundation
  8. Ake Wiberg's Foundation
  9. BioCARE
  10. Lund University
  11. BHF senior basic science research fellowship
  12. CRUK
  13. Dutch Cancer Society
  14. British Heart Foundation [RG/12/2/29416] Funding Source: researchfish
  15. Medical Research Council [MR/K011375/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  16. MRC [MR/K011375/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Therapy-induced resistance remains a significant hurdle to achieve long-lasting responses and cures in cancer patients. We investigated the long-term consequences of genetically impaired angiogenesis by engineering multiple tumor models deprived of endoglin, a co-receptor for TGF-beta in endothelial cells actively engaged in angiogenesis. Tumors from endoglin-deficient mice adapted to the weakened angiogenic response, and refractoriness to diminished endoglin signaling was accompanied by increased metastatic capability. Mechanistic studies in multiple mouse models of cancer revealed that deficiency for endoglin resulted in a tumor vasculature that displayed hallmarks of endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition, a process of previously unknown significance in cancer biology, but shown by us to be associated with a reduced capacity of the vasculature to avert tumor cell intra- and extravasation. Nevertheless, tumors deprived of endoglin exhibited a delayed onset of resistance to anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) agents, illustrating the therapeutic utility of combinatorial targeting of multiple angiogenic pathways for the treatment of cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据