4.7 Article

Analysis of the chronic lymphocytic leukemia coding genome: role of NOTCH1 mutational activation

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
卷 208, 期 7, 页码 1389-1401

出版社

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1084/jem.20110921

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [CA-37295, U54 CA121852-05]
  2. Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC) [10007]
  3. Progetto FIRB-Programma Futuro in Ricerca
  4. Progetto Giovani Ricercatori, Ministero della Salute, Rome, Italy
  5. Novara-AIL Onlus, Novara
  6. Helmut Horten Foundation
  7. San Salvatore Foundation
  8. Northeast Biodefence Center [U54-AI057158]
  9. National Library of Medicine [1R01LM010140-01]
  10. Novara-AIL Onlus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The pathogenesis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), the most common leukemia in adults, is still largely unknown. The full spectrum of genetic lesions that are present in the CLL genome, and therefore the number and identity of dysregulated cellular pathways, have not been identified. By combining next-generation sequencing and copy number analysis, we show here that the typical CLL coding genome contains <20 clonally represented gene alterations/case, including predominantly nonsilent mutations, and fewer copy number aberrations. These analyses led to the discovery of several genes not previously known to be altered in CLL. Although most of these genes were affected at low frequency in an expanded CLL screening cohort, mutational activation of NOTCH1, observed in 8.3% of CLL at diagnosis, was detected at significantly higher frequency during disease progression toward Richter transformation (31.0%), as well as in chemorefractory CLL (20.8%). Consistent with the association of NOTCH1 mutations with clinically aggressive forms of the disease, NOTCH1 activation at CLL diagnosis emerged as an independent predictor of poor survival. These results provide initial data on the complexity of the CLL coding genome and identify a dysregulated pathway of diagnostic and therapeutic relevance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据