4.7 Article

A highly tilted binding mode by a self-reactive T cell receptor results in altered engagement of peptide and MHC

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
卷 208, 期 1, 页码 91-102

出版社

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1084/jem.20100725

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [P01 AI045757, R01 AI064177]
  2. National Multiple Sclerosis Society
  3. Cancer Research Institute
  4. Offices of Biological and Environmental Research and of Basic Energy Sciences of the US Department of Energy
  5. National Center for Research Resources of the National Institutes of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Self-reactive T cells that escape elimination in the thymus can cause autoimmune pathology, and it is therefore important to understand the structural mechanisms of self-antigen recognition. We report the crystal structure of a T cell receptor (TCR) from a patient with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis that engages its self-peptide-major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) ligand in an unusual manner. The TCR is bound in a highly tilted orientation that prevents interaction of the TCR-alpha chain with the MHC class II beta chain helix. In this structure, only a single germline-encoded TCR loop engages the MHC protein, whereas in most other TCR-pMHC structures all four germline-encoded TCR loops bind to the MHC helices. The tilted binding mode also prevents peptide contacts by the short complementarity-determining region (CDR) 3 beta loop, and interactions that contribute to peptide side chain specificity are focused on the CDR3 alpha loop. This structure is the first example in which only a single germline-encoded TCR loop contacts the MHC helices. Furthermore, the reduced interaction surface with the peptide may facilitate TCR cross-reactivity. The structural alterations in the trimolecular complex are distinct from previously characterized self-reactive TCRs, indicating that there are multiple unusual ways for self-reactive TCRs to bind their pMHC ligand.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据