4.7 Article

Drug inhibition of HDAC3 and epigenetic control of differentiation in Apicomplexa parasites

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
卷 206, 期 4, 页码 953-966

出版社

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1084/jem.20082826

关键词

-

资金

  1. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  2. Agence National de la Recherche
  3. Lyon-Biopole
  4. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale
  5. ANR-MIME
  6. National Institutes of Health [AI05093, 1R01AI045806-01A1]
  7. Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plasmodium and Toxoplasma are parasites of major medical importance that belong to the Apicomplexa phylum of protozoa. These parasites transform into various stages during their life cycle and express a specific set of proteins at each stage. Although little is yet known of how gene expression is controlled in Apicomplexa, histone modifications, particularly acetylation, are emerging as key regulators of parasite differentiation and stage conversion. We investigated the anti-Apicomplexa effect of FR235222, a histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi). We show that FR235222 is active against a variety of Apicomplexa genera, including Plasmodium and Toxoplasma, and is more potent than other HDACi's such as trichostatin A and the clinically relevant compound pyrimethamine. We identify T. gondii HDAC3 (TgHDAC3) as the target of FR235222 in Toxoplasma tachyzoites and demonstrate the crucial role of the conserved and Apicomplexa HDAC-specific residue TgHDAC3 T99 in the inhibitory activity of the drug. We also show that FR235222 induces differentiation of the tachyzoite (replicative) into the bradyzoite (nonreplicative) stage. Additionally, via its anti-TgHDAC3 activity, FR235222 influences the expression of similar to 370 genes, a third of which are stage-specifically expressed. These results identify FR235222 as a potent HDACi of Apicomplexa, and establish HDAC3 as a central regulator of gene expression and stage conversion in Toxoplasma and, likely, other Apicomplexa.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据