4.7 Article

Bordetella evades the host immune system by inducing IL-10 through a type III effector, BopN

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
卷 206, 期 13, 页码 3073-3088

出版社

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1084/jem.20090494

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan [18390136, 21390133]
  2. Scientific Research on Priority Areas [19041066, 21022045]
  3. Kitasato University Research Grant for Young Researchers
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19041066, 21390133, 21022045, 18390136] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The inflammatory response is one of several host alert mechanisms that recruit neutrophils from the circulation to the area of infection. We demonstrate that Bordetella, a bacterial pathogen, exploits an antiinflammatory cytokine, interleukin-10 (IL-10), to evade the host immune system. We identified a Bordetella effector, BopN, that is translocated into the host cell via the type III secretion system, where it induces enhanced production of IL-10. Interestingly, the BopN effector translocates itself into the nucleus and is involved in the down-regulation of mitogen-activated protein kinases. Using pharmacological blockade, we demonstrated that BopN-induced IL-10 production is mediated, at least in part, by its ability to block the extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway. We also showed that BopN blocks nuclear translocation of nuclear factor kappa B p65 (NF-kappa Bp65) but, in contrast, promotes nuclear translocation of NF-kappa Bp50. A BopN-deficient strain was unable to induce IL-10 production in mice, resulting in the elimination of bacteria via neutrophil infiltration into the pulmonary alveoli. Furthermore, IL-10-deficient mice effectively eliminated wild-type as well as BopN mutant bacteria. Thus, Bordetella exploits BopN as a stealth strategy to shut off the host inflammatory reaction. These results explain the ability of Bordetella species to avoid induction of the inflammatory response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据