4.7 Article

Clearance of influenza virus from the lung depends on migratory langerin+CD11b- but not plasmacytoid dendritic cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
卷 205, 期 7, 页码 1621-1634

出版社

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1084/jem.20071365

关键词

-

资金

  1. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research
  2. Erasmus University Rotterdam
  3. Flemish government
  4. Dutch Asthma foundation
  5. Landsteiner Foundation for Blood Transfusion Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although dendritic cells (DCs) play an important role in mediating protection against influenza virus, the precise role of lung DC subsets, such as CD11b(-) and CD11b(+) conventional DCs or plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs), in different lung compartments is currently unknown. Early after intranasal infection, tracheal CD11b(-)CD11c(hi) DCs migrated to the mediastinal lymph nodes (MLNs), acquiring co-stimulatory molecules in the process. This emigration from the lung was followed by an accumulation of CD11b(+)CD11c(hi) DCs in the trachea and lung interstitium. In the MLNs, the CD11b(+)DCs contained abundant viral nucleoprotein (NP), but these cells failed to present antigen to CD4 or CD8 T cells, whereas resident CD11b(-)CD8 alpha(+) DCs presented to CD8 cells, and migratory CD11b(-)CD8 alpha(-) DCs presented to CD4 and CD8 T cells. When lung CD11c(hi) DCs and macrophages or langerin(+)CD11b(-)CD11c(hi) DCs were depleted using either CD11c-diphtheria toxin receptor (DTR) or langerin-DTR mice, the development of virus-specific CD8(+) T cells was severely delayed, which correlated with increased clinical severity and a delayed viral clearance. 120G8(+) CD11c(int) pDCs also accumulated in the lung and LNs carrying viral NP, but in their absence, there was no effect on viral clearance or clinical severity. Rather, in pDC-depleted mice, there was a reduction in antiviral antibody production after lung clearance of the virus. This suggests that multiple DCs are endowed with different tasks in mediating protection against influenza virus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据