4.7 Article

VEGF and TGF-β are required for the maintenance of the choroid plexus and ependyma

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
卷 205, 期 2, 页码 491-501

出版社

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1084/jem.20072041

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA45548, P01 CA045548] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NEI NIH HHS [EY05318, EY015435, R01 EY005318, R01 EY015435] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL079594, HL079594] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK065997, R01 DK065997] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NIGMS NIH HHS [F31 GM065079, F31-GM65079] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although the role of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in developmental and pathological angiogenesis is well established, its function in the adult is less clear. Similarly, although transforming growth factor (TGF) beta is involved in angiogenesis, presumably by mediating capillary (endothelial cell [EC]) stability, its involvement in quiescent vasculature is virtually uninvestigated. Given the neurological findings in patients treated with VEGF-neutralizing therapy (bevacizumab) and in patients with severe preeclampsia, which is mediated by soluble VEGF receptor 1/soluble Fms-like tyrosine kinase receptor 1 and soluble endoglin, a TGF-beta signaling inhibitor, we investigated the roles of VEGF and TGF-beta in choroid plexus (CP) integrity and function in adult mice. Receptors for VEGF and TGF-beta were detected in adult CP, as well as on ependymal cells. Inhibition of VEGF led to decreased CP vascular perfusion, which was associated with fibrin deposition. Simultaneous blockade of VEGF and TGF-beta resulted in the loss of fenestrae on CP vasculature and thickening of the otherwise attenuated capillary endothelium, as well as the disappearance of ependymal cell microvilli and the development of periventricular edema. These results provide compelling evidence that both VEGF and TGF-beta are involved in the regulation of EC stability, ependymal cell function, and periventricular permeability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据